WHAT SHALL I DO ABOUT THINNING MY PLANTATION WHEN PULPWOOD PRICES TAKE A NOSEDIVE?
Postponing a pulpwood thinning when prices are low seems
such a simple, money-making maneuver, but it’s not by a long shot. First, prices may not recover
to the level you desire. Second,
pulpwood-quality trees require just as much water, sunlight, and nutrients as
sawtimber-quality trees, and competition from them reduces growth of
sawtimber-quality trees, which usually sell for two or three times as
much. Third, overcrowding eventually
causes mortality and may make the stand more susceptible to Southern Pine
Beetle attack. Fourth, cash flows are delayed. Consequently, to provide
a means to predict the financial consequences of this decision, in the
hypothetical transactions described below, we’ve used data from an actual
plantation in Georgia to show how PTAEDA2V can reduce uncertainty.
Last year on the installment plan, N. Vester bought a 139-acre PPICâ that
developed from a CRP plantation. He
made a down payment of $81,900 and agreed to make future annual payments of
$10,176 to landowner and for forest-management services. Using PTAEDA2V and stumpage prices at the
time of purchase, he planned to earn an annual compound return of 13.25% by
thinning at age 12, fertilizing at age 13, and harvesting at age 22. Here, on a per acre basis, are details of his plans for
timber and cash flows during his ownership:
Stand At Age 12
| DBH Class
|
Number Trees
|
Average Height
|
Basal Area
|
Total Volume o.b.
|
Volume Cords
|
Volume Scribner bd.ft.
|
|
| 5
|
132.0
|
40.3
|
18.5
|
367.9
|
2.9
|
0.0
|
|
| 6
|
206.0
|
43.1
|
41.1
|
851.9
|
8.0
|
0.0
|
|
| 7
|
172.0
|
45.2
|
46.3
|
992.4
|
9.9
|
0.0
|
|
| 8
|
82.0
|
47.1
|
29.7
|
656.7
|
6.7
|
0.0
|
|
| 9
|
12.0
|
48.1
|
5.2
|
117.5
|
1.2
|
0.0
|
|
| 10
|
2.0
|
49.2
|
1.1
|
24.5
|
0.0
|
61.8
|
|
| Total
|
606.0
|
|
141.9
|
3010.8
|
28.7
|
61.8
|
|
Thinning at Age 12
| DBH Class
|
Number Trees
|
Average Height
|
Basal Area
|
Total Volume o.b.
|
Volume Cords
|
Volume Scribner bd.ft.
|
Stumpage Values
|
| 5
|
132.0
|
40.3
|
18.5
|
367.9
|
2.9
|
0.0
|
43.50
|
| 6
|
198.0
|
43.1
|
39.3
|
813.0
|
7.6
|
0.0
|
121.60
|
| 7
|
68.0
|
45.1
|
18.1
|
387.4
|
3.9
|
0.0
|
66.30
|
| 8
|
28.0
|
47.2
|
10.3
|
229.1
|
2.3
|
0.0
|
41.40
|
| 9
|
2.0
|
48.2
|
0.9
|
19.9
|
0.2
|
0.0
|
3.80
|
| Total
|
428.0
|
|
87.1
|
1817.3
|
16.9
|
0.0
|
276.60
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
less selling cost
|
55.32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Proceeds
|
221.28
|
Stand After Thinning
| DBH Class
|
Number Trees
|
Average Height
|
Basal Area
|
Total Volume o.b.
|
Volume Cords
|
Volume Scribner bd.ft.
|
|
| 6
|
8.0
|
44.2
|
1.8
|
38.8
|
0.4
|
0.0
|
|
| 7
|
104.0
|
45.2
|
28.2
|
604.9
|
6.1
|
0.0
|
|
| 8
|
54.0
|
47.0
|
19.4
|
427.6
|
4.4
|
0.0
|
|
| 9
|
10.0
|
48.1
|
4.3
|
97.6
|
1.0
|
0.0
|
|
| 10
|
2.0
|
49.2
|
1.1
|
24.5
|
0.0
|
61.8
|
|
| Total
|
178.0
|
|
54.8
|
1193.4
|
11.8
|
61.8
|
|
Harvest at Age 22
| DBH Class
|
Number Trees
|
Average Height
|
Basal Area
|
Total Volume o.b.
|
Volume Cords
|
Volume Scribner bd.ft.
|
Stumpage Values
|
| 8
|
2.0
|
66.7
|
0.8
|
24.1
|
0.2
|
0.0
|
4.40
|
| 9
|
30.0
|
71.8
|
14.0
|
465.4
|
4.8
|
0.0
|
124.80
|
| 10
|
38.0
|
75.8
|
21.4
|
752.7
|
0.0
|
2533.7
|
481.40
|
| 11
|
60.0
|
77.9
|
39.4
|
1419.0
|
0.0
|
5074.1
|
1420.74
|
| 12
|
26.0
|
80.7
|
20.4
|
760.8
|
0.0
|
2872.3
|
832.96
|
| 13
|
20.0
|
81.4
|
18.1
|
678.6
|
0.0
|
2636.7
|
777.82
|
| 14
|
0.0
|
0.0
|
0.0
|
0.0
|
0.0
|
0.0
|
0.00
|
| 15
|
2.0
|
86.5
|
2.4
|
94.9
|
0.0
|
385.7
|
117.63
|
| Total
|
178.0
|
|
116.4
|
4195.4
|
5.1
|
13502.5
|
3759.75
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
less selling cost
|
150.39
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Proceeds
|
3609.36
|
|
Here is his original cash-flow prediction:
|
|
|
Total Due
|
Payment
|
Interest
|
Principal
|
Balance
|
Dividend
|
Other
|
Description
|
| 2000
|
01/01
|
143,430
|
|
|
|
143,430
|
|
|
Start Rotation
|
|
|
01/01
|
|
81,900
|
|
|
61,530
|
|
|
Lump Sum
|
|
|
12/31
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,846
|
|
Dividend
|
|
|
12/31
|
|
10,176
|
8,179
|
1,997
|
59,533
|
|
|
Annual Payments
|
| 2001
|
05/31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,900
|
Fertilization |
|
|
12/31
|
|
10,176
|
7,891
|
2,284
|
57,249
|
|
|
Annual Payments
|
| 2002
|
12/31
|
|
10,176
|
7,589
|
2,587
|
54,662
|
|
|
Annual Payments
|
| 2003
|
12/31
|
|
10,176
|
7,246
|
2,929
|
51,732
|
|
|
Annual Payments
|
| 2004
|
12/31
|
|
10,176
|
6,857
|
3,318
|
48,413
|
|
|
Annual Payments
|
| 2005
|
12/31
|
|
10,176
|
6,417
|
3,758
|
44,655
|
|
|
Annual Payments
|
| 2006
|
12/31
|
|
10,176
|
5,919
|
4,256
|
40,399
|
|
|
Annual Payments
|
| 2007
|
12/31
|
|
10,176
|
5,355
|
4,820
|
35,578
|
|
|
Annual Payments
|
| 2008
|
12/31
|
|
10,176
|
4,716
|
5,459
|
30,118
|
|
|
Annual Payments
|
| 2009
|
12/31
|
|
10,176
|
3,992
|
6,183
|
23,935
|
|
|
Annual Payments
|
| 2010
|
12/31
|
|
|
|
|
|
503,144
|
|
Dividend
|
|
|
12/31
|
|
10,176
|
3,172
|
7,003
|
16,931
|
|
|
Annual Payments
|
| 2011
|
12/31
|
|
10,176
|
2,244
|
7,931
|
9,000
|
|
|
Annual Payments
|
| 2012
|
12/31
|
|
10,176
|
1,193
|
8,983
|
17
|
|
|
Annual Payments
|
| Balance:
|
143,430.68
|
| Lump Sum:
|
81,900.00
|
01/01/2000
|
| Annual Payment:
|
10,176.20
|
|
| Dividend 1:
|
30,846.43
|
12/31/2000
|
| Dividend 2:
|
503,144.78
|
12/31/2010
|
| Payout 1:
|
13,900.00
|
05/31/2001
|
Fertilization
|
| Calculated IRR:
|
13.25636% / Year
|
When the stand reached age 12, however, pulpwood stumpage prices were only half of what he had planned for. To assess the impact of selling at these prices, he ran the following cash-flow analysis:
|
|
|
Total Due
|
Payment
|
Interest
|
Principal
|
Balance
|
Dividend
|
Other
|
Description
|
| 2000
|
01/01
|
147,470
|
|
|
|
147,470
|
|
|
Start Rotation
|
|
|
01/01
|
|
81,900
|
|
|
65,570
|
|
|
Lump Sum
|
|
|
12/31
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,423
|
|
Dividend
|
|
|
12/31
|
|
10,176
|
7,844
|
2,332
|
63,238
|
|
|
Annual Payments
|
| 2001
|
05/31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,900
|
Fertilization |
|
|
12/31
|
|
10,176
|
7,544
|
2,631
|
60,606
|
|
|
Annual Payments
|
| 2002
|
12/31
|
|
10,176
|
7,230
|
2,945
|
57,661
|
|
|
Annual Payments
|
| 2003
|
12/31
|
|
10,176
|
6,879
|
3,297
|
54,364
|
|
|
Annual Payments
|
| 2004
|
12/31
|
|
10,176
|
6,485
|
3,690
|
50,673
|
|
|
Annual Payments
|
| 2005
|
12/31
|
|
10,176
|
6,045
|
4,130
|
46,542
|
|
|
Annual Payments
|
| 2006
|
12/31
|
|
10,176
|
5,552
|
4,623
|
41,919
|
|
|
Annual Payments
|
| 2007
|
12/31
|
|
10,176
|
5,001
|
5,175
|
36,743
|
|
|
Annual Payments
|
| 2008
|
12/31
|
|
10,176
|
4,383
|
5,792
|
30,951
|
|
|
Annual Payments
|
| 2009
|
12/31
|
|
10,176
|
3,692
|
6,483
|
24,467
|
|
|
Annual Payments
|
| 2010
|
12/31
|
|
|
|
|
|
503,144
|
|
Dividend
|
|
|
12/31
|
|
10,176
|
2,919
|
7,257
|
17,210
|
|
|
Annual Payments
|
| 2011
|
12/31
|
|
10,176
|
2,053
|
8,122
|
9,087
|
|
|
Annual Payments
|
| 2012
|
12/31
|
|
10,176
|
1,084
|
9,092
|
-4
|
|
|
Annual Payments
|
| Balance:
|
147,470.68
|
| Lump Sum:
|
81,900.00
|
01/01/2000
|
| Annual Payment:
|
10,176.20
|
|
| Dividend 1:
|
15,423.21
|
12/31/2000
|
| Dividend 2:
|
503,144.78
|
12/31/2010
|
| Payout 1:
|
13,900.00
|
05/31/2001
|
Fertilization
|
| Calculated IRR:
|
11.93015% / Year
|
Since he wanted to avoid a 1.3% decrease in IRR and thought that pulpwood prices would recover next year, he predicted tree growth to age 13 and made the
following cash-flow analysis:
Stand At Age 13
| DBH Class
|
Number Trees
|
Average Height
|
Basal Area
|
Total Volume o.b.
|
Volume Cords
|
Volume Scribner bd.ft.
|
|
| 5
|
94.0
|
43.0
|
13.6
|
285.3
|
2.3
|
0.0
|
|
| 6
|
184.0
|
45.6
|
36.6
|
799.2
|
7.5
|
0.0
|
|
| 7
|
176.0
|
47.9
|
47.2
|
1071.6
|
10.7
|
0.0
|
|
| 8
|
92.0
|
49.6
|
31.2
|
727.8
|
7.4
|
0.0
|
|
| 9
|
54.0
|
50.9
|
22.9
|
543.1
|
5.6
|
0.0
|
|
| 10
|
4.0
|
53.2
|
2.2
|
54.0
|
0.0
|
147.5
|
|
| Total
|
604.0
|
|
153.6
|
3481.0
|
33.4
|
147.5
|
|
Thinning at Age 13
| DBH Class
|
Number Trees
|
Average Height
|
Basal Area
|
Total Volume o.b.
|
Volume Cords
|
Volume Scribner bd.ft.
|
Stumpage Values
|
| 5
|
94.0
|
43.0
|
13.6
|
285.3
|
2.3
|
0.0
|
34.50
|
| 6
|
184.0
|
45.6
|
36.6
|
799.2
|
7.5
|
0.0
|
120.00
|
| 7
|
98.0
|
47.7
|
25.6
|
577.8
|
5.7
|
0.0
|
96.90
|
| 8
|
28.0
|
49.7
|
9.3
|
217.1
|
2.2
|
0.0
|
39.60
|
| 9
|
22.0
|
50.7
|
9.1
|
216.5
|
2.2
|
0.0
|
41.80
|
| Total
|
426.0
|
|
94.1
|
2095.9
|
19.9
|
0.0
|
332.80
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
less selling cost
|
66.56
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Proceeds
|
266.24
|
Stand After Thinning
| DBH Class
|
Number Trees
|
Average Height
|
Basal Area
|
Total Volume o.b.
|
Volume Cords
|
Volume Scribner bd.ft.
|
|
| 7
|
78.0
|
48.2
|
21.7
|
493.8
|
5.0
|
0.0
|
|
| 8
|
64.0
|
49.6
|
21.9
|
510.7
|
5.2
|
0.0
|
|
| 9
|
32.0
|
51.0
|
13.7
|
326.6
|
3.4
|
0.0
|
|
| 10
|
4.0
|
53.2
|
2.2
|
54.0
|
0.0
|
147.5
|
|
| Total
|
178.0
|
|
59.5
|
1385.1
|
13.5
|
147.5
|
|
Harvest at Age 22
| DBH Class
|
Number Trees
|
Average Height
|
Basal Area
|
Total Volume o.b.
|
Volume Cords
|
Volume Scribner bd.ft.
|
Stumpage Values
|
| 9
|
14.0
|
71.8
|
6.4
|
214.0
|
2.2
|
0.0
|
57.20
|
| 10
|
74.0
|
75.1
|
40.4
|
1405.5
|
0.0
|
4651.6
|
883.80
|
| 11
|
46.0
|
78.0
|
29.9
|
1076.7
|
0.0
|
3838.8
|
1074.86
|
| 12
|
32.0
|
79.7
|
24.9
|
916.1
|
0.0
|
3441.9
|
998.15
|
| 13
|
10.0
|
80.2
|
9.0
|
334.0
|
0.0
|
1294.0
|
381.73
|
| 14
|
2.0
|
81.3
|
2.2
|
82.3
|
0.0
|
329.3
|
98.79
|
| Total
|
178.0
|
|
112.9
|
4028.5
|
2.2
|
13555.7
|
3494.53
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
less selling cost
|
139.78
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Proceeds
|
3354.75
|
|
|
|
Total Due
|
Payment
|
Interest
|
Principal
|
Balance
|
Dividend
|
Other
|
Description
|
| 2000
|
01/01
|
145,334
|
|
|
|
145,334
|
|
|
Start Rotation
|
|
|
01/01
|
|
81,900
|
|
|
63,434
|
|
|
Lump Sum
|
|
|
12/31
|
|
10,176
|
8,023
|
2,152
|
61,281
|
|
|
Annual Payments
|
| 2001
|
12/31
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,113
|
|
Dividend
|
|
|
12/31
|
|
10,176
|
7,730
|
2,446
|
58,835
|
|
|
Annual Payments
|
| 2002
|
05/31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,900
|
Fertilization
|
|
|
12/31
|
|
10,176
|
7,421
|
2,754
|
56,080
|
|
|
Annual Payments
|
| 2003
|
12/31
|
|
10,176
|
7,074
|
3,102
|
52,978
|
|
|
Annual Payments
|
| 2004
|
12/31
|
|
10,176
|
6,682
|
3,493
|
49,485
|
|
|
Annual Payments
|
| 2005
|
12/31
|
|
10,176
|
6,242
|
3,933
|
45,551
|
|
|
Annual Payments
|
| 2006
|
12/31
|
|
10,176
|
5,745
|
4,430
|
41,121
|
|
|
Annual Payments
|
| 2007
|
12/31
|
|
10,176
|
5,187
|
4,989
|
36,132
|
|
|
Annual Payments
|
| 2008
|
12/31
|
|
10,176
|
4,557
|
5,618
|
30,513
|
|
|
Annual Payments
|
| 2009
|
12/31
|
|
10,176
|
3,849
|
6,327
|
24,186
|
|
|
Annual Payments
|
| 2010
|
12/31
|
|
|
|
|
|
467,652
|
|
Dividend
|
|
|
12/31
|
|
10,176
|
3,050
|
7,125
|
17,061
|
|
|
Annual Payments
|
| 2011
|
12/31
|
|
10,176
|
2,152
|
8,024
|
9,037
|
|
|
Annual Payments
|
| 2012
|
12/31
|
|
10,176
|
1,139
|
9,036
|
1
|
|
|
Annual Payments
|
| Balance:
|
145,334.00
|
| Lump Sum:
|
81,900.00
|
01/01/2000
|
| Annual Payment:
|
10,176.20
|
|
| Dividend 1:
|
37,113.85
|
12/31/2001
|
| Dividend 2:
|
467,652.15
|
12/31/2010
|
| Payout 1:
|
13,900.00
|
05/31/2002
|
Fertilization
|
| Calculated IRR:
|
12.61422% / Year
|
As the calculations show, a rise in pulpwood prices to their original level is not enough to increase Vester's IRR to its original level. There are two reasons for this: 1) The proceeds from the thinning will increase because of tree growth, but they will be delayed a year, 2) harvest proceeds will fall because the trees suffered one more year of competition from the pulpwood trees and had only nine years to respond to fertilization.
Neither Vester nor anyone else can predict even one second of the future, so his guesses about future prices may always be bad. But PTAEDA2V predictions about the interaction of tree growth, fertilizer, thinning, and time are remarkably accurate. That's because PTAEDA2V is an individual-tree, distance-dependent growth-and-yield model and is the product of 20 years research by a co-op of the biggest companies in the field. Predictions by the new windows version are the best way we know of to reduce the guesswork about how to handle your property.
If you have Vester's problem, we'd be pleased to make the measurements and perform the PTAEDA2V calculations or teach you how to do them yourself.