VARDAMAN VIRTUAL FORESTRY COMPANY

The Most Direct Link to Knowledge Workers in the Southeast Forest Economy


Home
Friday Report
PTAEDA2V
Selling Land/Timber
Investments
Pine Plantations
Genetics
Fertilization
Stumpage Prices
JMV's Book
Links








Google

Search WWW Search vardaman.com


THE KIND OF REGENERATION PLAN NEEDED BY SERIOUS INVESTORS

The secondmost important operation in making money growing trees (timber sales procedure is first) is regeneration. You get only one shot at it, and you're stuck with it for at least 20 years. The right plan often creates an investment with a 12% annual real return (IRR); the wrong one usually produces a real IRR of less than 6%. We prepared the following plan for an actual tract in Georgia, and we present it almost in full to demonstrate many important procedures.

We have completed our site evaluation and reforestation plan for your tract in Land Lot ___, ____ Land District, ______ County, Georgia. The recommended management plan follows.

We tested 480 different scenarios with various cultural treatments, tree spacings, thinning ages, levels of thinning, and harvest ages. To evaluate them, we first forecast by computer simulation the volume of timber produced by each. We then applied current market prices and discounted future values to the present at the 8% interest rate you chose to arrive at the bare land values.

Bare land value (BLV) is an important criterion for evaluating possible management options. BLV is the net present value of all future crops assuming that the practices be repeated indefinitely. Looked at another way, BLV is a measure of what the land is worth when it is used in a given manner. The best options are as follows:

Option
Number

Trees/
acre

Site -
prep

Thinning
age

Residual
basal area

Harvest
age

Bare Land
Value

1

330

H

13

75

23

$ 835.14

2

330

HR

12

80

21

999.95

3

363

H

13

80

22

845.05

4

363

HR

11

75

21

1,005.40

5

330

MB

12

80

22

976.01

6

330

MBR

11

80

21

1,211.45

7

363

MB

12

75

22

920.57

8

363

MBR

11

80

21

1,137.66

NOTE: "H" = herbicidal site-prep, hand planting, no herbaceous release

"HR" = herbicidal site-prep, hand planting, with herbaceous release

"MB" = mechanical site-prep, bedded, machine planting, no herbaceous release

"MBR" = mechanical site-prep, bedded, machine planting, with herbaceous release

Option 6 yields the highest BLV. If first-year seedling survival falls below 95%, however, the reduced stocking level will allow the trees to become too limby, thus reducing the quality of the sawtimber trees. We recommend option 8, as it provides a greater margin of safety on seedling survival and reduces risk to the investment.

We estimate the IRR for options 6 and 8 to be 11.92% and 11.67%, respectively. This small reduction in return on capital is, we believe, a small price to pay for greater security.

Option 8 includes mechanically preparing the site by shearing the residual vegetation and raking into windrows, bedding the area to be planted, machine planting of 363 grade-1, second-generation coastal-plain, loblolly seedlings per acre, and releasing them from herbaceous competition in the spring following planting ("band spraying" by tractor.)

The plan calls for thinning the trees at age 11 by removing those not suitable for sawtimber plus enough small-diameter trees to reduce basal area to 80 square feet per acre. The residual stand should contain about 200 trees per acre of the best-quality trees and should be harvested at age 21.

Should you engage us to perform the reforestation work according to option 8, we will solicit bids for the work from vendors on our list and Georgia Forestry Commission lists and submit the bids to you for approval. We will specify the requirements of the work and supervise the vendor you choose. We will inspect the prepared acreage and verify all work before you disburse payment. We will order custom-grown seedlings, have the seedlings stored in a refrigerated warehouse in Albany, deliver them fresh to the site, have the vendor apply LiquaGel to the root systems, inspect for proper planting techniques, and keep a record of the plots we take on the stocking. We will also certify the average root-collar diameter of a sample of the seedlings. Finally, we will cruise the planted areas approximately one year later to report first-year survival.

Our fee for supervising the work is 15% of all costs as incurred. A schedule of estimated costs for each part of the planting operation is shown in the attached management plan.

We recommend that you apply for possible government subsidies to help offset the cost of reforestation. You should do this by contacting the county ASCS office. If approved, you will find that the Georgia Forestry Commission will impose certain restrictions for you to qualify for payment. They may approve only a limited acreage, insist on a higher number of planted trees per acre, and specify other practices.

If you wish, we will make an economic analysis of any GFC plan, so that you can decide whether governmental restrictions attached to the subsidy will reduce the bare land value by more than the payment you will receive. We will quote you a price for the analysis before doing it.

If you want us to proceed with the plan as described in option 8 above, please sign, date, and return one copy of this letter to us, and keep the other copy for your records. We will not begin soliciting bids for the work until cutting operations have concluded and you receive a release from ______ Timber Company. The cutting contract will expire on 31 March 1997.

THE VARDAMAN FOREST MANAGEMENT PLAN

28 April 1995

The following Management Plan is for approximately 76 pine plantable acres in Land Lot ___, ____ Land District, ______ County, Georgia.

The dominant soil type is Alapaha loamy sand. Using a soil auger, we verified this according to SCS description:

Typically, the surface layer is black loamy sand about 5 inches thick. The subsurface layer is loamy sand and extends to a depth of about 28 inches. It is dark gray in the upper part and gray in the lower part. The subsoil is sandy clay loam and extends to a depth of 70 inches or more. The upper part of the subsoil is gray with light yellowish brown mottles, and the lower part is mottled brownish yellow, red, light gray and strong brown. Plinthite is below a depth of about 46 inches and makes up 5 to 15 percent of the lower part of the subsoil.

To determine the normal site index, we searched for dominant and codominant loblolly pines on which to measure their age and total height. As this tract is dominated by slash pine with loblolly and longleaf as minor components, relatively few loblolly trees were available to be measured. Also, many trees exhibit mechanical injury from a windstorm or other event several years ago. This is seen as a "crook" about 10 to 15 feet below the top of the tree. While the damage has not reduced the merchantable volume of the trees, it has affected total tree height.

Of the several loblolly trees present, only three qualified for site index measurement, being dominant or co-dominant in the stand, free of defect and disease, and not over-crowded. These trees exhibit a site index, base age 25, of 69.1 feet. Nevertheless, a sample of such small size is not sufficient to establish site index for the entire tract.

As data were lacking to establish site index from the existing stand, we used data from the USDA Soil Survey for ______ County. First, we estimated the percent of total area covered by each of the six soil types present. Then using the site indices listed in the soil survey, we calculated the average site index for the tract weighted by acreage. By this method, we estimate the average normal site index, base age 25, for the pine plantable area to be 66.6 feet.

According to a chart prepared by Dr. Lee Allen of the North Carolina State Forest Nutrition Cooperative, the practice of bedding on the Alapaha and related soils will yield a weighted average gain in site index of 4.6 feet. Adding the bedding gain to the estimated normal site index yields a total of 71.2 feet. Since we recommend using 2nd generation improved seedlings, we further revised the normal site index up 11% to 79.0 feet.

FORECAST OF TIMBER GROWTH-AND-YIELD AND CASH FLOWS FOR FIRST ROTATION

COMPUTER INPUTS FOR OPTION 8

No. of simulated growing seasons: 21 Random number seed: 68767

Site Index (base age 25): 79.0

Simulation size: 20 rows by 20 trees

Percent of trees inherently pulp quality: 16.0%

PLANTING INFORMATION

--Machine Planted--

Distance between rows: 12.0' Distance between trees: 10.0'

Maximum variance between rows: 10.0%

Maximum variance between trees: 10.0%

Trees planted per acre: 363.0

Establishment quality boost in years: 3

FERTILIZATION INFORMATION

--Not Fertilized--

HARDWOOD COMPETITION

Percent of total basal area: 4.8%

OUTPUT INFORMATION

Juvenile stand output: NO Thinning report output: YES

ASCII File: YES

Growing seasons completed before requesting

first management routine: 11

Volume units in cords and board feet, Scribner scale

SUMMARY OF OUTPUTS

Live Trees, Age 11

INPUTS

PREDICTED

Site Index

79.0

Dominant Height

50.1

Growing Seasons Completed

11.0

Average DBH

7.6

Planted Trees

363.0

Average Height

47.3

Percent Hardwood

4.8

Average Crown Ratio

52.3

DBH
Class
Number
Trees
Average
Height
Basal
Area
Total Volume
o.b.
Volume Cords
To 4.in
Volume Scribner
bd.ft.

3

.9

32.3

.1

1.0

.0

.0

4

19.1

36.8

1.7

32.0

.0

.0

5

22.7

41.0

3.2

64.6

.5

.0

6

41.7

44.4

8.3

176.6

1.7

.0

7

59.0

46.9

16.2

360.2

3.6

.0

8

73.5

48.8

25.5

585.3

5.9

.0

9

48.1

50.1

20.9

489.6

5.0

.0

10

30.9

51.3

16.7

399.8

.4

955.9

11

19.1

52.3

12.6

306.4

.8

710.0

12

2.7

55.1

2.0

52.2

.0

173.4

TOTAL

317.6

107.3

2467.6

17.9

1839.3

Thinned Trees, Age 11

INPUTS

PREDICTED

Site Index

79.0

Dominant Height

49.3

Growing Seasons Completed

11.0

Average DBH

6.3

Planted Trees

363.0

Average Height

44.0

Percent Hardwood

4.8

Average Crown Ratio

47.6

DBH
Class

Number
Trees

Average
Height

Basal
Area

Total
Volume
o.b.

Volume
Cords
To 4.in

Volume
Scribner
bd.ft.

3

.9

32.3

.1

1.0

.0

.0

4

19.1

36.8

1.7

32.0

.0

.0

5

22.7

41.0

3.2

64.6

.5

.0

6

35.4

44.4

6.8

145.5

1.3

.0

7

14.5

47.2

4.0

89.9

.9

.0

8

10.9

48.8

3.9

89.0

.9

.0

9

7.3

50.4

3.2

74.6

.8

.0

10

2.7

52.3

1.5

37.2

.4

.0

11

4.5

53.2

3.0

73.7

.8

.0

TOTAL

118.0

27.4

607.6

5.6

.0

Live Trees After Thinning, Age 11

INPUTS

PREDICTED

Site Index

79.0

Dominant Height

50.9

Growing Seasons Completed

11.0

Average DBH

8.5

Planted Trees

363.0

Average Height

49.2

Percent Hardwood

4.8

Average Crown Ratio

55.1

DBH
Class

Number
Trees

Average
Height

Basal
Area

Total
Volume
o.b.

Volume
Cords
To 4.in

Volume
Scribner
bd.ft.

6

6.4

45.3

1.4

31.1

.3

.0

7

44.5

46.8

12.2

270.3

2.7

.0

8

62.6

48.8

21.6

496.3

5.0

.0

9

40.8

50.1

17.7

415.0

4.3

.0

10

28.1

51.2

15.2

362.5

.0

955.9

11

14.5

52.0

9.6

232.7

.0

710.0

12

2.7

55.1

2.0

52.2

.0

173.4

TOTAL

199.7

79.9

1860.0

12.3

1839.3

Live Trees, Age 21

INPUTS

PREDICTED

Site Index

79.0

Dominant Height

81.2

Growing Seasons Completed

21.0

Average DBH

11.3

Planted Trees

363.0

Average Height

78.4

Percent Hardwood

4.8

Average Crown Ratio

35.9

DBH
Class
Number
Trees
Average
Height
Basal
Area
Total
Volume
o.b.
Volume
Cords
To 4 in.
Volume
Scribner
bd.ft.
8
6.4
70.0
2.4
77.6
.8
.0
9
20.9
73.1
9.5
321.6
3.3
.0
10
44.5
76.8
24.6
875.3
.0
2939.1
11
49.9
78.7
32.8
1193.2
.0
4280.6
12
29.0
79.6
22.7
835.5
.0
3142.7
13
24.5
81.7
22.6
852.4
.0
3325.8
14
15.4
81.0
16.7
622.4
.0
2483.1
15
7.3
85.6
8.7
343.3
.0
1395.3
16
1.8
85.8
2.4
95.0
.0
390.0
TOTAL
199.7
142.4
5216.3
4.1
17956.5

ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

In our economic analysis, we estimated total regeneration costs (shearing, raking, bedding, seedlings, planting, release and 15% supervision) to be $281.35 per acre. We also used a real, compound discount rate of 8.0%, chosen by you, annual property taxes of $2.78 per acre, assumed that no prices would change and that this series of operations would be repeated every 22 years forever. Stumpage prices were derived from the sealed-bid sale from this tract on 24 February 1995.

Schedule of Estimated Regeneration Costs

(All costs per acre)

Shearing and raking...................................... $130.00

Bedding.................................................... 35.00

Seedlings ................................................. 18.15

Planting................................................... 35.00

Release (chemicals + tractor application).................. 26.50

sub total................................................ $244.65

JMVCo 15% supervisory fee.................................. 36.70

TOTAL.................................................... $281.35

Summary of inputs:

INTEREST RATE

REAL interest rate: 8.00%

COSTS PER ACRE

Planting costs: $ 281.35 Maintenance costs: $ 2.78

Thinning costs as percent of thin: 33.33%

Harvest costs as percent of harvest: 5.20%

ANALYSIS TYPE: -- Both BLV and one rotation NPV --

UNIT VALUES

DBH
Class
Value ($)
Thin
Value ($)
Harvest
DBH
Class
Value ($)
Thin
Value ($)
Harvest

5

15.00

20.00

12

35.00

340.00

6

20.00

25.00

13

35.00

360.00

7

25.00

30.00

14

35.00

380.00

8

30.00

35.00

15

35.00

400.00

9

35.00

40.00

16

35.00

420.00

10

35.00

300.00

17

35.00

420.00

11

35.00

320.00

18

35.00

420.00

EVALUATION OF THINNING EVALUATION OF HARVEST

UNIT TOTAL MBF/ UNIT TOTAL

Evaluation of Thinning

Evaluation of Harvest

DBH
Class

CORDS

UNIT
$ VALUE

TOTAL
$ VALUE

MBF / Cords

UNIT
$ VALUE

TOTAL
$ VALUE

5

.505

15.00

7.57

.0000

20.00

.00

6

1.349

20.00

26.97

.0000

25.00

.00

7

.906

25.00

22.66

.0000

30.00

.00

8

.906

30.00

27.18

.7949

35.00

27.82

9

.770

35.00

26.94

3.3286

40.00

133.15

10

.388

35.00

13.58

2.9392

300.00

881.75

11

.766

35.00

26.82

4.2807

320.00

1369.83

12

.000

35.00

.00

3.1428

340.00

1068.54

13

.000

35.00

.00

3.3258

360.00

1197.30

14

.000

35.00

.00

2.4832

380.00

943.60

15

.000

35.00

.00

1.3953

400.00

558.14

16

.000

35.00

.00

.3900

420.00

163.81

Gross Thinning =

$ 151.72

Gross Harvest =

$ 6343.94

Less 33.33% selling fee -

50.57

Less 5.20% selling fee -

329.89

Net Thinning =

$ 101.15

Net Harvest =

$ 6014.05

(Gross thinning = $27.14/cord)

(Gross harvest = $39.04/cord + $344.32/MBF)

INTERNAL RATE OF RETURN

Assumptions:

Fair Market Value of cutover timberland .......................... $350.00/ac

One time planting costs....................................... $281.35/ac

Annual property tax........................................... $2.78/ac

Cash Flows from thinning and harvest as shown above

Year

Net Cash Flow

Year

Net Cash Flow

0

-631.35

12

-2.78

1

-2.78

13

-2.78

2

-2.78

14

-2.78

3

-2.78

15

-2.78

4

-2.78

16

-2.78

5

-2.78

17

-2.78

6

-2.78

18

-2.78

7

-2.78

19

-2.78

8

-2.78

20

-2.78

9

-2.78

21

-2.78

10

-2.78

22

6,011.27

11

98.37

23

347.22

INTERNAL RATE OF RETURN = 11.67%

ChESS INPUTS FOR HERBACEOUS RELEASE TREATMENT

As a first step in prescribing the release treatment, we ran the characteristics of the site through Chemical Expert System for Silviculture (ChESS), a computer program developed at Virginia Tech. A summary of inputs follows:

1. This is a prescription for (No.): 2
1. Site preparation
2. Herbaceous weed control/release
2. Name of tract:
3. State (No.): 4 1.AL 2.AR 3.FL 4.GA 5.KY 6.LA 7.MS 8.NC 9.OK 10.SC 11.TN 12.TX 13.VA
4. Province (No.): 1 1. Coastal Plain 2. Piedmont 3. Mountains
5. Slope Position (No.): 2 1. Xeric (dry) 2. Mesic (moderate) 3. Hydric (wet)
6. Crop Tree Species (No.): 2 1. White Pine
2. Loblolly Pine
3. Slash Pine
4. Virginia Pine
5. Longleaf Pine
6. Shortleaf Pine
7. Suitability for aerial application: Is tract size and shape OK for aerial applications, or if not, can it be "piggybacked" with other tracts? (Yes or No): Yes

8. What is the texture of the soil? (No.) 5
1. Very fine : Clay
2. Fine : Clay-loam, silty-clay-loam, silty-clay, or sandy-clay
3. Medium : Loam, silt-loam, sandy-clay-loam, or silt
4. Coarse : Sandy-loam
5. Very Coarse : Sand or loamy-sand
9. Which choice best describes the slope of the tract? (No.): 1
9. 1. Less than 35% 2. 35-50% 3. Greater than 50%
10. Is the distance of the tract from sensitive areas less than the distances listed below? (Yes or No): No
9. Domestic water source less than 500 . feet
9. House000000000000"9.. " 5009 9."
9. Park 000000000000"9.. " 1,000 9"
9. School000000000000"9.. " 1,000 9"
9. Vista 000000000000"9.. " 2,500 9"
9. Other000000000000"9.. " 1,000 9"
11.Is the distance from susceptible crops less than the distances listed below? (Yes or No): Yes
9. Alfalfa less than 100 feet00000 Peas less than300 feet
9. Beans 0"0.0 " 3000. " 00000Peanuts.."9.. "3009 ."
9. Corn 0"0.0 " 1000. " 00000Squash.."9.. "1009 ."
9. Cotton0"0.0 " 6000. " 00000Tobacco.."9.. "6009 ."
9. Grape0"0.0 " 1,000 "00000Tomatoes.."9.. "3009 ."
9. Oats0"0.0 " 1000. " 00000Wheat.."9.. "1009 ."
12.Is herbaceous weed control needed the season following this application? (Yes or No): No
13.Choose the time of year that the application needs to be made (No.) 2
9. 1. Fall 9 .00l2. Spring 9 .00l 3. Summer 9 .00l 4. Does not matter
14.Is there potential for groundwater contamination (Y or N): No
15.What is the organic content of the soil? (No.) 1
9. 1. .1% 9 .0l2. .2% 9 .0l3. .3% 9 .0l4. .4% 9 .0l5. .5% 9 .0l6. .greater than 5%

Prescription From ChESS

You should now select herbicides from the following list considering overall efficacy and cost of application at the recommended rate. Prescriptions will be written for the herbicides selected:

----------Rate----------
Herbicide NameAerial
lbs ai/A
G-hand
lbs ai/A.
G-tractor
lbs ai/A
1) Hexazinone-liquidsee pressee pressee pres.
2) Hexazinone-Pronone2.52.52.5
3) Imazapyr0.50.50.5
4) Sulfometuron0.20.20.2
5) Sulf. + Hexazinone 0.2 + 0.50.2 + 0.50.2 + 0.5
6) Sulf. + Atrazine0.03 + 1.00.03 + 1.00.03 + 1.0
7) Sulf. + Imazapyrsee pressee pressee pres.

Which of the above herbicides do you want prescriptions for? 7

SULFOMETURON+IMAZAPYR Herbaceous Weed Control Prescription for Tractor Application

DuPont and American Cyanamid Sulfometuron 75% ai + Imazapyr 54% ai, 4 ae lb/gal

Oust + Arsenal Applicators Concentrate

Apply 2 oz Oust + 6 oz Arsenal AC in 5 to 30 gallons of water per acre. Use a minimum of .25% by volume of a non-ionic surfactant. Drift control and anti-foaming agents may be added as needed.

Thoroughly clean application and mixing equipment immediately after use. Prolonged exposure of this product to uncoated steel surfaces may result in corrosion and failure of the exposed part.
Product can be applied throughout the growing season, but early season weed control is generally considered best for optimum pine growth.

Herbaceous weed control is most effective when used in conjunction with intensive site preparation which exposes mineral soil and favors an influx of annual grasses and forbs. Imazapyr can stunt growth of pines when applied at the highest label rates. Lower rates tank-mixed with sulfometuron methyl (Oust) are recommended for effective weed control and maximum pine growth.

Resistant species: sicklepod, coffeeweed and tropic croton

SEEDLINGS TO BE USED

Should you engage us to perform the reforestation work, we will use 2nd-generation, genetically-improved, coastal-plain loblolly pine seedlings. The most important characteristic of such seedlings is how crowded they were in the nursery bed and how much this crowding affected development of vigorous roots and shoots. We currently have available seedlings that were grown at 15-20 trees per square foot in the nursery bed ("low density"). Our supplier guarantees a minimum average root collar diameter of 5.0 millimeters, which is sufficient to produce the projected results. We will measure and certify to you a sample of the seedlings showing the actual average root collar diameter. Our supplier will deliver these seedlings to a refrigerated warehouse in Albany, where we will pick up fresh seedlings each day and deliver them to the planting site.

SURVIVAL CONSIDERATIONS

The key to profitable forest management is regulation of competition of all kinds at all times. In addition to controlling competition from herbaceous plants and hardwood species, we must also regulate competition between planted seedlings themselves. If there are too many of these, their growth will be too slow. The ideal way to accomplish this last mission is to obtain, as closely as possible, the right number of living seedlings at the end of the first growing season.

Our analyses with PTAEDA2V+ECONV reveal that there is very little difference in IRR between planting 330 or 363 trees per acre. PTAEDA2V predicts that survival at age eight for these initial planting rates will be 293 and 317, respectively, and other data show that almost all mortality occurs during the first growing season. We recommend 363 initial trees to give you a small margin of safety, but of course, 300 live seedlings at the end of the first growing season will be enough to accomplish the financial results that we have predicted.

We will make every reasonable effort to ensure the best possible care and survival of the seedlings. We cannot, however, assume responsibility for events beyond our control, e.g., fire, drought, or flood, that adversely affect seedling survival.

Please call me if you need further clarification.